Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2577 14
Original file (NR2577 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001

 

TAL

Docket No: 2577-14/
~ 1516-11

24 September 2014

 

This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated

20 November 2013 with enclosures. You previously petitioned the
Board and were advised in our letter of 29 November 2011, that.
your application had been denied.

Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, any material .
submitted in support of your application, and your prior case
file.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined the character references, employer
awards and certificates from your place of worship you
submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board,
were insufficient to establish the existence of material error
or injustice. The Board determined the character references,
awards and. certificates were not enough to outweigh the
significant misconduct you committed while on active duty.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot. be taken. You are entitled to have.
.the Board reconsider its.decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official record, the burden is on the

applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

   

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00592-05

    Original file (00592-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4544 14

    Original file (NR4544 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority concurred with the ADB and directed separation under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 12 October 1994,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11064-06

    Original file (11064-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 12 September 1986 after four years of prior honorable service. As a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09160-07

    Original file (09160-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 March 1971. After review by the discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08210-02

    Original file (08210-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 20 October 1980, the commanding officer notified you that administrative separation action had been initiated by reason of misconduct due to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9300 13

    Original file (NR9300 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your request for discharge was granted and on 25 May 1973, you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05210-08

    Original file (05210-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00558-07

    Original file (00558-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 4 April 1972 at age 18 and served without disciplinary incident...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11334-07

    Original file (11334-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your release from active duty for a fully honorable characterization of service.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03234-07

    Original file (03234-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...